As an observant of people, I get used to getting to know how other people feel towards others or things. It takes a while to understand the clockwork in such peculiar behaviours. I never got the hang of how I manage to understand a lot of these things until recently. I mean the world has held billions and billions of beings, each having their own single purpose and that not every one is the same.
A scientist who earns to research about plants and it's system will experiment with a real-living and breathing subject, in this case a real plant. He will also would want to reproduce the like in such a manner that he can use it as an innovation, in this case he will invent something artificial that will work like plants but are not real plants. This may be because he wants to know how the nature works without deceasing factors.
A car racer would test his driving on a simulator, or say he tried a new manoeuvre that might be fatal to his car, he would test this on a simulator to be sure that it is safe and won't go wrong and kill someone off.
The point isn't comparing an observant to any professional jobs like the ever-so-supported scientists and racers. The reason in the comparison is that their steps to achieve a successful result is by comparing a natural subject by an artificial subject. In the racer's case his idealism was the natural subject and the simulator as the artificial.
Seeing another person in another light, or any other person in general, isn't an easy feat, considering that one person can generate thousands of possibilities that can change the world in a thousand different ways, literally. To reach to an agreement level we need to know what they are capable of in generating the possibilities around them. Like the scientist, he cannot understand the nature first hand, but rather by hypothesis-es made in the past and what plants have done through observation.
Okay no, we're not talking about how many possibilities people have, but how observations takes place. Unconsciously, an observant would imitate their subject in a way that they are virtually in their position, but still have that overall mindset of themselves. I wasn't aware of this at all, I just thought that being able to think like others was a plus. I thought this was normal.
I realised that what have kept me going and moving in the tidal motion was the numerous emotions and situations that people are in, in which I also simulate within my own reality to understand the differences in the world that is orbiting around us.
Now then, as a personal recall, it was a simple interval between breathing. It was no biggie, but I realised that it was a controlled breathing. Naturally we breathe involuntarily, unlike the heart beating, we can stop breathing instantly. I mean it is normal human instinct to be conscious of their breathing when someone points it out, but this was different. And then the thought struck me, it wasn't me being cautious about my breathing or the subject, but it was me asking 'why is he/she controlling his/her breathing?'. Ten the brainstorm came, conclusions emerged, and no definite answer appeared.
